There's More to Sovereign AI Than GPUs and Energy
Nations that fail to build infrastructure ecosystems risk falling behind in global AI competition.
Written by Kevin Collins | 4 min • August 27, 2025
Which topics do you want to hear about?
*Required
You are subscribed to The Array!
We'll send you the latest news.
Building sovereign AI compute capacity has become a geopolitical arms race — a strategic bet on national competitiveness in the era of artificial intelligence. At first glance, it seems simple enough: stack racks, buy GPUs, run cables, keep the lights (and cooling) on. But the reality is far more complex, capital-intensive, and risk-laden than the obvious checklist of bare metal, network, energy, and cooling.
And that complexity is where the future will be won, or lost.
Beyond the Obvious: Why Compute Alone Isn’t Enough
In the AI world, compute is the raw material. But at the sovereign level, building the infrastructure to harness it requires far more than silicon. Demand generation isn’t a foregone conclusion; it must be cultivated through value-added services, specialized tooling, and vertical expertise that can make sovereign AI infrastructure competitive with the hyperscalers.
Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and Oracle have built sprawling ecosystems of AI-optimized tooling, from orchestration frameworks to monitoring systems to security layers — all deeply integrated and notoriously sticky. These ecosystems lock customers in precisely because the tooling is as valuable as the hardware beneath it. For sovereign AI initiatives, matching that depth of value-add is essential.
The Sustainability Mirage
In AI, “sustainability” is too often reduced to renewable energy sourcing. While renewables are vital, they’re only one layer of a much bigger challenge. Massive energy consumption remains a problem — renewable or not — because it still diverts scarce resources. The deeper sustainability hurdle is operational: the relentless need to refresh high-end GPUs, scale capacity in step with rapidly advancing model complexity, and deliver flawless, uninterrupted performance for workloads where downtime is simply unacceptable.
For example, life sciences demands five-nines reliability. Financial services needs ironclad privacy and security baked into every layer. Industrial AI requires low-latency performance at scale. The infrastructure to deliver that across both training and inferencing is exponentially more complex than traditional enterprise workloads, and light years beyond the hardware-centric requirements of the crypto-mining boom.
A Kubernetes Parable?
The complexity problem isn’t new. Kubernetes was once heralded as the great equalizer in containerization and the technology that would make scale effortless. I even bought into that one.
In reality, kubernetes brought its own labyrinth of configuration, customization, and babysitting. AI infrastructure multiplies that complexity with its own alphabet soup of LLM, LCM, SLM, A2A, MPC, RAG, NLP, AGI, GPT and so much more. Each introduces integration, orchestration, and performance challenges that few traditional data center operators have encountered at scale.
Turn AI into ROI
Build the solid foundation you need to enable AI today, and more confidently lead the AI innovations of tomorrow.
The Canadian Context: Winners, Losers, and Niche Opportunities
Canada offers a useful case study. A wave of AI-oriented data center projects reveals stark disparities in readiness with some backed by significant capital while others are in early-stage buildouts; and yet others that are pivoting. While players like eStruxture and QScale have secured a sizeable war chest necessary to compete, many smaller entrants face investor skepticism and strategic uncertainty.
The difference isn’t just capital; it’s also positioning and differentiation. This is a highly competitive market dominated by entrenched giants, from the hyperscalers to Telus and BCE. The winners must understand that colocation does not equal data center does not equal cloud. And, AI requires the full cloud stack — including elasticity, orchestration, GPU lifecycle management — as well as the ability to refresh infrastructure at the breakneck pace of AI innovation.
The financial analysis of these firms, from market leaders to struggling entrants, points to long investment horizons before returns materialize. The capital commitments are enormous, and investor patience is finite. As the AI market shifts shape at a blistering pace, these companies will need to articulate a clear, defensible economic case for their bets or risk losing both capital and confidence.
For smaller players, survival, and growth may depend on specialization. Targeting sectors where latency, localized data residency, and domain-specific optimizations are critical could open defensible niches. Edge computing, IoT, MedTech, and FinTech may no longer dominate headlines, but their AI infrastructure demands remain mission-critical and, in many cases, underserved by hyperscale providers. These are industries where proximity, precision, and trust can outweigh raw scale.
Whether a traditional data center or co-location provider can pivot into this space is another matter. SATO Technologies illustrates the difficulty. Its Qritical.AI initiative signals an ambition to reinvent, but regaining investor confidence will take more than a name change. It requires a clearly defined, differentiated AI value proposition backed by flawless execution. And that holds true for CCDS and others. The crypto-mining mindset won’t cut it here — AI is a more complex, deeply integrated, and economically transformative arena where mistakes are costly and second chances are rare.
The Bottom Line
Sovereign AI infrastructure isn’t just about building data centers. It’s about building an ecosystem: the tools, processes, and services that make compute useful for AI at scale. It’s about enabling industries with stringent performance, security, and compliance requirements to innovate without compromise.
Anyone can throw money at GPUs. Sustaining relevance in a market where AI evolves faster than procurement cycles — and where hyperscalers already dominate — is a different game entirely. The next wave of disruption will come from everywhere: lean tech insurgents with more efficient models, new economic paradigms, and the rise of an agentic AI future where intelligent systems operate and collaborate autonomously.
For sovereign AI to deliver strategic long-term advantage, it can’t just be space with energy, cooling and servers. It must be the beating heart of a nation’s innovation economy with a platform that attracts talent, accelerates industries, and keeps the country in the race as the rules are rewritten in real time.
This article originally appeared in Investment Insights from Charli, a Substack blog.
Kevin Collins
Contributor
Kevin Collins brings over 20 years of experience in AI and technology innovation. Before co-founding Charli, Kevin was the CEO and co-founder of Bit Stew Systems, where he led the development of AI applications for industrial IoT. His work on digital twins and scalable AI models laid the foundation for Charli’s mission to create AI-powered solutions that tackle complex tasks.
The Array is a thought leadership publication curated by Hitachi Vantara, dedicated to exploring the intersection of data, technology, innovation, and leadership. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the individual authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of Hitachi Vantara or its affiliates.
